How programs play out
Case studies
Representative programs from the sites we monitor. Client names and identifying details are withheld; figures are from our monitoring logs for the periods described.
Construction
Construction site, Koreatown: copper theft stopped at the fence
- Problem
- A mid-rise project lost two wire spools and a generator in three weeks. Cameras recorded everything; nobody watched them.
- Approach
- Perimeter line-crossing zones on the existing cameras, a solar tower on the dark side, live talk-down and response dispatch under written post orders.
- Result
- In the following 60 nights: 4 intrusion attempts verified, 4 ended by live audio warning, 1 response dispatch, 0 losses. Fence gap repaired after the first incident report.
4Intrusions stopped
0Losses in 60 nights
2:19First response ETA
Logistics
Distribution yard, Carson: the bobtail that left empty
- Problem
- A loaded trailer was stolen from a 50-trailer yard with a tailgated gate. The operator wanted every tractor logged and the rows watched.
- Approach
- LPR on both lanes with appointment matching, vehicle-dwell rules on trailer rows, thermal on the back fence, and a gate-challenge protocol.
- Result
- Second month: a bobtail backing toward Row C at 02:05 was warned and left without a trailer; plate forwarded to police. Gate tailgating incidents dropped from weekly to zero after the first challenge.
1Trailer theft prevented
100%Tractors logged
0Tailgates in month 3
Convenience
Convenience store group, South LA: the closing routine
- Problem
- Five stores, five different closing habits, two cash discrepancies a month and an owner who got 20 goodnight texts.
- Approach
- Closing verification checklist with live call-back, cash procedure verification, after-hours monitoring and one morning report across all five stores.
- Result
- Propped rear doors at close fell from 11 in the first week to 1 in week six. Cash discrepancies: 0 in the following quarter. The owner reads one email at 7 a.m.
11 → 1Propped doors (wk 1 → wk 6)
0Cash discrepancies next quarter
1Morning email instead of 20 texts
Telecom
Wireless dealer, Hawthorne: devices accounted for
- Problem
- A three-store dealer had unexplained device variances every month and a commission dispute with every statement.
- Approach
- Cage access logging and demo-wall checks, IMEI-level reconciliation from the dealer system, and monthly carrier-to-POS commission reconciliation.
- Result
- Variances traced to an unlogged cage habit and a transfer gap between two stores; both fixed by procedure. Commission disputes went from monthly to none in the following two cycles.
3Serials traced on camera
0Commission disputes (2 cycles)
5 daysStatement to reconciled
Case studies are anonymized composites of monitored sites. Outcomes vary by site, cameras and protocol; see service limitations.
Request a quote
Get a flat monthly price for your property.
Send a site address and a camera count. We come back with a coverage map, a recommended program and pricing — usually within one business day.
Call the monitoring center · 24/7(323) 904-1202
Office5830 Overhill Dr., Suite #4, Los Angeles, CA 90043
Get started
Want a case study with your address on it?
Start with the free three-night test and see what the first report says.
(323) 904-1202Request a site assessment Response within one business day · Free camera-coverage review